Tools of fiscal policy and their advantages and disadvantages
Fiscal policy implementation and difficulties faced in implementation
Introduction to Monetary and Fiscal Policy
As compared to households and corporations, the economic decisions made by governments can have an enormous impact on economies because governments are usually the largest employers, largest spenders and largest borrowers in an economy.
There are two types of government policy:
Fiscal policy: Refers to government decisions about taxation and spending.
Monetary policy: Refers to central bank activities directed towards influencing the quantity of money and credit in the economy.
The overall goal of these policies is to create an economic environment in which growth is stable and positive and inflation is stable and low.
Roles and Objectives of Fiscal Policy
Fiscal policy refers to the taxing and spending policies of the government.
A government can influence the following aspects of the economy:
Primary objective
Overall level of aggregate demand in an economy and hence the level of economic activity.
Secondary objective
Distribution of income and wealth among different segments of the population.
Allocation of resources between different sectors and economic agents.
Roles and Objectives of Fiscal Policy
Fiscal policy can be contractionary or expansionary.
Expansionary fiscal policy:
Lower taxes
Cuts in personal income tax (disposable income).
Cuts in sales taxes (lowers prices).
Cuts in corporate taxes increase business profits (corporates have more money to invest).
Higher government spending on social goods and infrastructure.
Contractionary fiscal policy: It is the opposite of expansionary fiscal policy. Higher taxes or lower government spending are examples of contractionary fiscal policy.
What are the Keynesian and Monetarist views on the effectiveness of fiscal policy?
Keynesian View
Monetarist View
Government intervention is necessary in the form of fiscal policy to get an economy out of recession. They believe that the aggregate demand, employment, and output increase with fiscal policy.
Monetary policy is a more effective tool to tame inflation; monetarists advocate a steady, stable monetary policy. They believe that Fiscal policy only has a temporary effect.
Government Receipts and Expenditures in Major Economies
Example
As of 2015, for the US, government revenue as a percent of GDP was 33.4%, while the government expenditure as a percent of GDP was 37.6%.
The possibility that fiscal policy can influence output means that it can be used to stabilize an economy.
The budget deficit is the difference between government revenue and expenditure for a fixed period of time. Government revenue includes tax revenues, net of transfer payments; government spending includes interest paid on government debt.
An increase in budget surplus indicates a contractionary fiscal policy.
An increase in budget deficit indicates an expansionary fiscal policy.
Two fiscal policies to stabilize the economy include:
Automatic stabilizers: When the economy slows and unemployment rises, government spending on social insurance and unemployment benefits will rise. Whereas, if the economy is at full employment, taxes collected will be high and there will be a budget surplus. These happen automatically without the intervention of policymakers, and the focus is primarily on aggregate demand. They help reduce the impact of a recession.
Discretionary fiscal policies: Changes in government spending or tax rates. In contrast to automatic stabilizers, this depends on the policy makers. The policies differ primarily with respect to timing.
A balanced budget is one where government spending is equal to government revenues.
Deficits and the National Debt
where:
c = marginal propensity to consume
t = tax rate
The fiscal multiplier is inversely related to the tax rate and directly related to the marginal propensity to consume.
Example
What is the value of the fiscal multiplier if the tax rate is 20%, and the marginal propensity to spend is 90%? What is the increase in total income if government spending increases by $1 billion?
Solution:
Fiscal multiplier = = 3.57.
A $1 billion increase in government spending increases total income by $3.57 billion.
The Balanced Budget Multiplier
A balanced budget is a fiscal policy tool where the increase in government spending on goods and services is equal to the increase in tax revenues. The net effect is that there is no change in the budget deficit or surplus.
Since it is a balanced budget, government expenditure and taxes go up by the same amount. If this is the case, then the aggregate output actually rises. How? Because the fiscal multiplier is a function of marginal propensity to consume, c. Since c is less than 1, output Y increases.
Example
Assume in equilibrium, output Y = 1,000; C = 900 and I = 100. Assume government spending increases by 200, which is financed by an increase in tax revenue of 200. MPC = 0.9
Fiscal multiplier effect = 10
Taxes increase by 200. Disposable income decreases by 200.
Consumption decreases by
Initial impact on aggregate demand = 200 – 180 = 20
Impact on output because of multiplier effect = 20 * 10 = 200
Fiscal Policy Implementation
The deficit is not an indication of the government’s fiscal stance because an economy goes through a cycle.
Peak of a cycle, unemployment would be low and government expenditure would be less with the likelihood of running a surplus.
In a recession, incomes are low and taxes collected will be relatively low, causing the budget deficit to increase.
One cannot conclude if the government is following a contractionary or expansionary policy by simply looking at the deficit.
To get an idea of the government’s policy, one should look at the structural or cyclically adjusted budget deficit. This is the deficit if the economy was at full employment.
If the output is at long-run equilibrium, then the surplus or deficit would be called the structural or cyclically adjusted budget deficit.
Automatic stabilizers such as social security payments, progressive income taxes, and VAT must be considered to determine the fiscal stance. As unemployment rises, the benefits increase and net tax revenues decrease.
These do not require policy changes, and automatically kick in to stimulate growth.
In addition, there are also discretionary fiscal adjustments used by governments, such as tax changes, or huge spending to build a highway system in a country, to increase aggregate demand.
The two approaches to fiscal policy vary primarily with respect to timing of implementation. But fiscal policy does not always stabilize an economy, as executing fiscal policy can be difficult for the following reasons:
Recognition lag: There is a time lag before policymakers recognize whether the economy is going through a boom or is in recession. This is because it takes time to gather and collate the data: indicators such as unemployment and inflation are often presented weeks later.
Action lag: Once the policymakers acknowledge the problem, then they have to decide on an action plan. The appropriate policy takes time to implement and must be passed through the congress/parliament/whatever is appropriate. For instance, increased spending on infrastructure to generate employment and boost growth may take several months to complete.
Impact lag: It may be a while before the result of the projects undertaken can be seen.
The timing of the policy action is critical. It is important to understand the course of the economy without these policy changes. Is the economy in recovery mode because of a surprise increase in investment spending? Some issues associated with discretionary fiscal adjustments are:
If a government is concerned with unemployment and inflation, then increasing AD to full employment may push prices further up.
If the deficit is already large relative to GDP, then it may be difficult for the government to borrow more money to provide fiscal stimulus. Interest on government debt would rise.
Crowding out effect: Limited savings and increase in government spending → investment available for private sector decreases → less investment spending → less growth.
Macroeconomic forecasting models are not accurate and cannot be used for policymaking decision effectively.