Market Efficiency
Go to Equity Investments
Topics
Table of Contents
Introduction
Market efficiency concerns the extent to which market prices incorporate available information.
Investors are interested in market efficiency because if prices do not fully incorporate information, then opportunities exist to make abnormal profits. Governments and regulators are interested in market efficiency because market efficiency promotes economic growth.
The Concept of Market Efficiency
The Description of Efficient Markets
- An informationally efficient market is one in which asset prices reflect new information quickly and rationally.
Quickis relative to the time a trader takes to execute an order. If it takes 15 minutes for new information to be incorporated into security prices and trade execution time is 30 minutes, we can say the new information is incorporated quickly.- Market prices should not react to information that is well anticipated; only unexpected information should move prices.
- In a perfectly efficient market investors should use a passive investment strategy because active investment strategies will underperform due to transaction costs and management fees.
Market Value vs Intrinsic Value
- Market value of an asset is its current price at which the asset can be bought or sold.
- Intrinsic value is the value that would be placed on an asset by investors if they had full knowledge of the asset’s characteristics.
- In highly efficient markets, full information is available in the market and is reflected in asset prices. Therefore, market value = intrinsic value.
- However, if markets are not efficient, the two prices can diverge significantly.
Factors Affecting Market Efficiency Including Trading Costs
The following factors affect a market’s efficiency:
- Market Participants – More participants increase efficiency.
- Information availability and financial disclosure – More information increases efficiency.
- Limits to trading – Limitations on arbitrage and short selling decrease efficiency.
Two types of costs are incurred by traders when trading on market inefficiencies: transaction costs and information-acquisition costs.
These costs should be considered when evaluating a market’s efficiency.
- Transaction costs – High costs decrease efficiency.
- Information-acquisition costs – High costs decrease efficiency.
Forms of Market Efficiency
Market Prices reflect:
| Forms | Past Market | Public Info | Private Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weak | Yes | No | No |
| Semi Strong | Yes | Yes | No |
| Strong | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Evidence that investors can consistently earn abnormal returns by trading on the basis of information would challenge the efficient market hypothesis.
Weak Form
- Security prices fully reflect all past market data
- Non-market public and private information is not necessarily incorporated into the stock price.
- Technical analysts cannot make abnormal returns on a consistent basis simply by analyzing historical market information.
Tests
- Look at patterns of prices. Is there any serial correlation in security returns? If yes, the market is not weak-form efficient.
- Can trading rules or any technical analysis method involving historical data be used to make abnormal profits? If yes, then it contradicts weak-form efficiency.
Semi-Strong Form
- Prices reflect all publicly known and available information. This includes financial data such as earnings and dividends, and trading data such as closing prices, volume, etc.
- Weak-form is a subset of semi-strong-form.
- Prices adjust quickly and accurately to new public information.
- Efforts to analyze publicly available information are futile.
- Fundamental analysis will not lead to abnormal returns in the long run. Lots of fundamental analysts (active investors, portfolio managers) evaluating securities to buy/sell help the market in becoming semi-strong-form efficient.
Tests
- Researchers test for when markets are semi-strong-form efficient using event studies.
- Most research indicates that developed securities markets are semi-strong-form efficient while developing countries’ markets may not be semi-strong-form efficient.
Strong Form
- Prices reflect all public and private information
- It encompasses semi-strong and weak form.
- Investors will not be able to earn abnormal profits by trading on private information.
Tests
- Researchers test whether a market is strong-form efficient by testing whether investors can earn abnormal profits by trading on non-public information.
- Most research indicates that markets are not strong-form efficient as regulations prohibit the use of private information (or insider trading).
Implications of the Efficient Market Hypothesis
| Forms | Implication | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Weak | Investors cannot earn abnormal returns by trading on the basis of past trends in price. | Technical analysts assist markets in maintaining its form. |
| Semi Strong | Analyst must consider whether the information is already reflected in security prices and how any new information affects a security’s value. | Fundamental analysts assist markets in maintaining its form. |
| NOT Strong | Investors trading on private information can make abnormal profits. | Regulations try to prevent insider trading. |
| If markets are semi-strong form efficient, active portfolio managers cannot outperform the market on a consistent basis, therefore investors should invest passively. |
The role of portfolio managers is not necessarily to beat the market, but to establish and manage portfolios consistent with their clients’ objectives and constraints
Market Pricing Anomalies – Time Series and Cross-Sectional
A market anomaly is something that challenges the idea of market efficiency.
Some anomalies observed in the market are:
Time-Series Anomalies
- Calendar anomalies: The returns in January are higher than in any other month, especially for small firms. This phenomenon is known as the January effect.
- Momentum and overreaction anomalies: Momentum effect refers to the findings that stocks that have experienced high-returns in the short term tend to continue to generate higher return in subsequent periods.
Overreaction effect is based on the idea that investors often overreact to events or release of unexpected public information. For example, it has been observed that stocks that have had poor returns in the past three-to-five years (losers) tend to outperform the market in subsequent periods.
Cross-Sectional Anomalies
- Size effect: Small-cap stocks tend to perform better than large-cap stocks.
- Value effect: Value stocks (stocks with lower P/E, P/B or high dividend yields) tend to perform better than growth stocks.
Other Anomalies, Implications of Market Pricing Anomalies
- Closed-end investment fund discounts: Closed-End investment funds sell at a discount to NAV.
- Earnings surprise: Investors can earn abnormal profits by buying stock of companies with positive earnings surprise and selling those with negative earnings surprise.
- IPOs: Prices rise on listing day, but underperform in the long term.
- Predictability of returns based on prior information: Research has found that equity returns are related to prior information such as interest rates, inflation rates, stock volatility, and dividend yields.
In practice, it is not easy to trade and benefit from anomalies. Most research concludes that anomalies are not violations of market efficiency, but are the result of statistical methods used to detect anomalies.
Many anomalies might simply be a result of data mining. At times researchers carefully analyze data and form a hypothesis. This is the opposite of what should happen. Ideally, a hypothesis should be formed and then the data should be analyzed to accept or reject the hypothesis.
Behavioral Finance
Behavioral finance uses human psychology to explain investment decisions.
Some irrational behavior and biases observed in the market are:
- Loss aversion: Investors dislike losses more than they like gains of the same amount.
- Herding: In herding, investors ignore their private information and act as other investors do.
- Overconfidence: Overconfident investors do not process information. They place too much confidence in their ability to process and analyze information and, thus, value a security.
- Information cascades: Information cascade is when people observe the actions of a handful of market participants and blindly follow their decisions. The informed participants act first and their decision influences the decisions of others.
Other Behavioral Biases
- Representativeness: Investors with this bias will assess probabilities based on events seen before, or prior experiences, instead of calculating the outcomes.
- Mental accounting: Investors divide investments into separate mental accounts, they do not view them as a total portfolio.
- Conservatism: Investors tend to be slow to react to changes.
- Narrow framing: Investors focus on issues in isolation.
Behavioral Finance and Investors
Behavioral biases affect all investors irrespective of their experience. An understanding of behavioral finance will help individuals make better decisions, both individually and collectively.
Behavioral Finance and Efficient Markets
If investors must be rational for efficient markets, the existence of behavioral biases implies that the markets cannot be efficient. If the effects of the biases did not cancel each other out, then the markets could not be efficient. But, since investors are not making abnormal returns consistently, the markets can be considered efficient. Evidence supports market efficiency.
In other words, markets can be considered efficient even if market participants exhibit seemingly irrational behavior.